Bail denied in forging of Court documents case
(court, crime, jammu, imp today – schedule at 3)
STATE TIMES NEWS
JAMMU: Principal Sessions Judge, Jammu, R.S Jain rejected the bail application of Kamaldeep Singh, who forged court documents.
The FIR was registered on the direction of 2nd Additional Sessions Judge Jammu. According to the FIR No.175/2011 for offence under sections 467,468,419,420 RPC was registered in Police Station Janipur, Jammu against the petitioner.
During investigation file was seized from the court of Second Addl. Sessions Judge, Jammu and statements of the witnesses have been recorded under Section161 CrPC and as per the investigation it has been found against the petitioner had opened an account in Federal Bank, Jalandhar, Punjab and petitioner had been arrested in FIR 27/2009 and recovery was also effected in a theft case and Challan is pending against the petitioner in the court of 2nd Addl. Sessions Judge, Jammu and as per directions of the court the account of petitioner was frozen.
The accused after being released by the court filed an application in the bank that his account be released as has been directed by the concerned court. The manager of the bank sought the court order from the accused where upon the accused presented a written order dated 23rd November, 2010 and also presented an Urdu document and its translation. In respect of which the bank manager wrote a letter dated 2nd December, 2010 to the concerned court to confirm the order whereupon a reply was received from the concerned court.
During this period accused withdrew Rs. 25,000 from the bank. On receipt of the letter from the court it came out that petitioner had forged the aforementioned court documents. Petitioner has been arrested 16th October, 2014.
Principal Sessions Judge Jammu R.S Jain after hearing both the sides observed that Petitioner submits that he has been arrested in a false and frivolous case. It be noted that the complaint has been filed on the directions of 2nd Addl.Sessions Judge, Jammu and the allegations against the accused is that he forged the documents in the name of the court which is a serious offence and cannot be taken lightly. With these observations Court rejected the bail. JNF