STATE TIMES NEWS
JAMMU: Babli (Anita Sharma), the accused in FIR 48/23 for impersonation, cheating and fraud, has been directed not to leave the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir without the prior permission of the Court.
Babli (Anita Sharma) is the main accused in FIR 48/23 registered against her by Jammu Crime Branch wing of Jammu and Kashmir Police (JKP) under sections 420, 120-B IPC for impersonation, cheating and fraud
“The bail is subject to conditions that Anita Sharma (Babli) shall cooperate with the Investigating Officer as and when directed. Anita Sharma shall not leave the J&K UT without the prior permission of the court and she shall not influence any witness. She shall also not contact any witness conversant with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing the truth before the IO,” the bail order states.
As per bail orders, Anita Sharma shall furnish bail bond of surety and a personal bond of Rs 50,000 each before the Investigating Officer (IO) of Crime Branch, which she has furnished.
The CB sleuths investigating the case are keeping a close watch on her movement.
Anita Sharma (Babli), resident of 23 B/C Gandhi Nagar, wife of Shiv Kumar Sharma (Bunty), a known financer, fruit dealer and wine merchant, is currently on bail.
According to FIR 48/23, Anita Sharma alias Babli impersonated as the owner of House Number 84/110-A, Gandhi Nagar and tried to cheat Jammu Municipal Corporation (JMC) to get under process certificate which she used to befool municipal officers during construction of House Number 44 D/C Gandhi Nagar whenever officials of Municipal Corporation approached at the site. Anita Sharma used to tell to the concerned officials that she has applied for the building permission to JMC on August 12, 2019. To substantiate her point, she used to show false documents by concealing the factual position. This, in the process, caused a huge loss to the JMC and the state exchequer by not depositing the requisite Building Permission Fee by adopting fraudulent means.
The illegal construction was in gross violation of the setbacks and other norms of the JMC evading amount of building permission fee and causing loss to the government exchequer.
